Saturday, January 26, 2013

Newtown Victims' Families Join Gun-Control Activists on DC March

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Near-freezing temperatures didn't stop several thousand gun-control activists from bearing their pickets today, carrying signs emblazoned with "Ban Assault Weapons Now" and the names of gun violence victims in a demonstration organized as a response to the mass shooting in Newtown, Conn. last month.

Walking in silence, the demonstrators trudged between Capitol Hill and the Washington Monument over a thin layer of melting snow. They were joined by politicians and some families of the Newtown victims.

March organizer Shannon Watts said the event was for the "families who lost the lights of their lives in Newtown, daughters and sons, wives and mothers, grandchildren, sisters and brothers gone in an unfathomable instant."

"Let's stand together and use our voices, use our votes to let legislators know that we won't stand down until they enact common sense gun control laws that will keep our children out of the line of fire," she told demonstrators.

Watts founded One Million Moms for Gun Control after the killing of 20 first graders and six adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown in December. In a profile with the New York Times, Watts said her 12-year-old son had suffered panic attacks after learning of last summer's Aurora, Colo., theater shooting, leaving her at an impasse over how to talk to him about the latest tragedy.

Also among the speakers was a survivor of the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre, Collin Goddard.

"We need to challenge any politician who thinks it's easier to ask an elementary school teacher to stand up to a gunman with an AR-15 than it is to ask them to stand up to a gun lobbyist with a checkbook," he said.

The demonstration comes amid a push by progressive lawmakers to enact stricter gun control measures as a response to the trend of recent mass killings, although any hypothetical bill would likely face strong opposition in Congress.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., was among the demonstrators today.

"The idea that people need high-capacity magazines that can fire 30, 50, 100 rounds has no place in a civilized society," he said. "Between the time we're gathered here right now and this time of day tomorrow, across America, 282 Americans will have been shot."

The congressman was quoting statistics compiled by the Brady Campaign to Stop Gun Violence.

INFOGRAPHIC: Guns by the Numbers

Last week President Obama proposed a sweeping overhaul of federal measures regulating gun ownership, including a universal background check system for sales, banning assault weapons, and curbing the amount of ammunition available in weapon clips.

An ABC News/Washington Post poll released Thursday found 53 percent of Americans viewed Obama's gun control plan favorably, 41 percent unfavorably. The division was visible today, as a handful of gun-rights advocates also turned out on the National Mall to protest what they believe would be infringements on their Second Amendment liberties.

ABC's Joanne Fuchs contributed to this report.

Also Read

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/newtown-victims-families-join-gun-control-activists-dc-215945128--abc-news-politics.html

marijuana huffington post elizabeth warren puerto rico diane sawyer Cnn.com

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Just 78 Days Later, the House Passes $50.7 Billion Sandy Relief Bill

After a few stumbles and a lot of arguing, the House of Representatives approved $50.7 billion in emergency aid to areas?decimated?by Hurricane Sandy on Monday night. The winning side of the 241 to 180 vote included nearly all of the House Democrats and 49 Republicans, many of whom represent the damaged areas. The final package actually made it through in two separate pieces, though: the initial bill that includes $17 billion in immediate aid and an amendment with $33.6 billion in longer-term funding. (As The Washington Post's Rosalind Helderman explains, "Splitting the bill into two pieces allowed Republicans who wanted to provide immediate help to be able to withhold their votes from the long-term effort.") It's not the perfect outcome for New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a Republican, and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, who requested nearly $80 billion in aid, but it's better than nothing. And it only took Congress 78 days since the disaster to get it done!

RELATED: Why Boehner Delayed the Sandy Bill

This could've been settled two weeks ago, when many New York and New Jersey lawmakers thought they would be voting on a Sandy relief package. However, without warning or explanation, House Speaker John Boehner delayed the vote?which was expected to take place after the fiscal cliff vote?, drawing ire from both sides of the aisle. At that point in time, action was already well overdue. It took Congress 31 days to approve aid after Hurricane Andrew and just 10 days to approve relief for Hurricane Katrina victims.

RELATED: The GOP and New York's Money: A Love Story

Christie, for one, was?characteristically vocal about his disapproval. "There is only one group to blame," said Christie at a press conference after the vote was delayed. "The House majority and their Speaker, John Boehner. ??Shame on you, shame on Congress." After the backlash, Boehner promised to make Sandy relief "the first priority" of the next Congress. It later emerged that Boehner was afraid of an "insurrection" forming around him immediately after the fiscal cliff crisis. "After this mess, I just can't do it tonight," he told former Rep.?Steve LaTourette at the time.

RELATED: Why the House GOP Left the Hurricane Sandy Relief Bill Out in the Cold

It could've been much worse for Hurricane Sandy victims, though. The disaster did happen a while ago, and it did take Congress quite a lot of heel-dragging to make it to Tuesday night's vote. But at least they made it. There was plenty of speculation before he scheduled the vote last week that Boehner would invoke the so-called "Hastert Rule," which requires a majority of the majority to agree to a measure before it comes up for a vote on the floor. Boehner ignored the rule and scheduled the vote anyways.?

RELATED: Cellphone Companies Are Ignoring the Rules of Natural Disaster

From here, the bill heads to the Democrat-controlled Senate which is expected to pass the bill and then on to Obama who is expected to sign it. Certain controversial measures like an amendment that would've offset the cost of the package by cutting every federal agency budget by 1.63 percent. Even some Republicans agreed that this is money well spent, though. In the words of House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers, a Kentucky Republican, said it best when convincing his colleagues to throw their support behind the package: "At times, the spending of federal dollars is indeed necessary.?Natural disasters hit unexpectedly, and sometimes require a response that we cannot foresee."?

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/just-78-days-later-house-passes-50-7-022052516.html

wall street journal us map Electoral Map concede Obama Acceptance Speech Prop 30 Election 2012

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Former Costa Concordia captain: 'I regret nothing'

The Costa Concordia remains partially submerged off the Italian coast, serving as a memorial one year after its tragic accident. NBC's Michelle Kosinski reports.

By Michelle Kosinski, Correspondent, NBC News

NAPLES, Italy -- The former captain of the Costa Concordia cruise liner says he understands why some people "hate" him, but has no regrets about his actions in the aftermath of the shipwreck that left 32 people dead.

Francesco Schettino did not attend the unveiling of memorials in Giglio, Italy, over the weekend as survivors and victims' families marked the one-year anniversary of the accident. Instead, the luxury cruise liner?s former captain was at his home near Naples, where he lives under some court restrictions.

Accused of multiple manslaughter, causing the wreck and abandoning ship, Schettino told NBC News the toughest part of the aftermath of the crash was that people think he did not try to help the situation after he took the ship off course during a sail-by salute of the coast.

?Everybody believes that I was escaping from the sinking ship,? he said. However, Schettino contended he ?tried to make an effort to make sure that I was the last one to leave the ship???from the sinking side."


Schettino, who described himself as a strict captain, insisted that other people should share the blame for the accident.

He said Costa Cruises told him before the wreck that he needed to share some authority with his well-qualified, lower-ranking officers who felt he was "breathing too much down their necks."?

Gregorio Borgia / AP file

Francesco Schettino, former captain of the Costa Concordia, says he appreciated having the opportunity to share his side of the story with a survivor of the crash.

"And unfortunately I was relying, in the last three minutes, on an officer, when all of a sudden he was handing me the control of the ship without giving me distance???nothing," Schettino said.

That, he said, was when he noticed foam on the water???a sign of shallow water or something jutting from the surface.?

"I regret that I was trusting (that officer).? I was trusting him before the accident, and also after the accident.? And I have been living with these things inside me.? I will never trust anyone anymore because this was a very deadly mistake," he said.

Schettino claimed he had no way to tell how many people were still on board when he left the vessel.

"People don't understand that the ship is 58 meters (nearly 200 feet) wide, so you don't have a chance to see who else is left on the other side.? And in the moment the floor started to become steeper, you have no other option: To die, or to swim," he said.??So, I regret nothing."

Schettino said he understood why people "hate" him?? but added he did not think he deserved this.

"If you lose your child -- or any member of your family because of an accident -- you start to learn to live with this kind of pain that you have inside you.? But if you are not able to find a reason because you just believe you lost that person because of the stupidity or arrogance of somebody else, it is more difficult not to start to hate people," he said.

?I will do my best to relay the reasons why this tragedy took place, in a way that is very well represented, very well analyzed, simply because I don't like that people may potentially hate me,? he said.

/

The Costa Concordia, carrying more than 4,200 passengers, ran aground Jan. 13 off the coast of Italy killing 32 people - including two Americans.

He said he appreciated the chance to share his perspective of the crash with a survivor.

"It was a great pleasure speaking with that person???they fully understand me now. ... It would have given me great pleasure to meet the others,? he said, adding that he would wait, let the truth to come out and allow time for people to absorb it.

?I am close to anybody in this, and I join my pain to their pain, even if there is a difference,? he said.??I have the pain of a person who is responsible for the cruise ship and I have never denied that. Never."

Related stories:
High-seas safety in spotlight after deadly Concordia crash
A year after Costa Concordia disaster, emotions resurface
Engineers still ponder how to salvage Costa Concordia wreck

Source: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/16/16531308-former-costa-concordia-captain-i-regret-nothing?lite

cujo karen handel hangout todd haley kareem abdul jabbar miramonte elementary school mark jenkins

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The Voice Top Four: Who Will Win Season 3?

Source:

at last al green burger king delivery

Officials: Serbia's NATO ambassador leaps to death

BRUSSELS (AP) ? Serbia's ambassador to NATO was chatting and joking with colleagues in a parking garage at Brussels Airport when he suddenly strolled to a barrier, climbed over and flung himself to the ground below, a diplomat said.

By the time his shocked colleagues reached him, Branislav Milinkovic was dead.

His motives are a mystery. Three diplomats who knew Milinkovic said he did not appear distraught in the hours leading up to his death Tuesday night. They said he seemed to be going about his regular business, picking up an arriving delegation of six Serbian officials who were due to hold talks with NATO, the alliance that went to war with his country just 13 years ago.

A former author and activist opposed to the authoritarian regime of Serbia's former strongman Slobodan Milosevic, he was a respected diplomat and leading intellectual in his country, officials said.

The diplomats, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release details, said they knew of no circumstances ? private or professional ? that would have prompted him to take his own life.

One of the diplomats described the death to The Associated Press, saying she had spoken to a member of the delegation who had witnessed the leap from the 8- to 10-meter-high (26- to 33-foot-high) platform.

The diplomats all spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not permitted by foreign service regulations to speak publicly to the press.

Speaking in Brussels, Serbia's Prime Minister Ivica Dacic said that "Belgian police are investigating, but it's obviously a suicide. It's hard to figure out the motives or causes."

The death cast a pall on the second day of a meeting of NATO foreign ministers. Officials said they were shocked by the news of the death of a very popular and well-liked ambassador.

NATO's Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said he was "deeply saddened by the tragic death of the Serbian ambassador."

"As Serbian ambassador to NATO he earned the respect and admiration of his fellow ambassadors," he said.

During the 1990s, Milinkovic was active in the opposition to Milosevic. After he was ousted in 2000, Milinkovic was appointed Serbia's ambassador to the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe, or OSCE, in Vienna.

He was transferred to NATO as Serbia's special representative in 2004. Serbia is not a member of the military alliance, but Milinkovic was named ambassador after Belgrade joined NATO's Partnership for Peace program, which groups neutral states.

The move to join the NATO program had angered Serbian nationalists who are now in power. They have pledged the nation will never join because of the alliance's 1999 bombing campaign, during which it forced Milosevic's forces to withdraw from Serbia's southern province of Kosovo.

Milosevic was widely blamed for instigating the Balkan wars that followed the breakup of Yugoslavia, conflicts that claimed more than 100,000 lives and left millions homeless.

Milinkovic worked to foster close ties with other ambassadors from the former Yugoslavia, recently organizing a dinner for a Croat colleague who was transferred to Moscow.

Milinkovic is survived by his wife and 17-year-old son.

_____

Stojanovic reported from Belgrade, Serbia.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/officials-serbias-nato-ambassador-leaps-death-093459101.html

nba finals K Michelle roger clemens multiple sclerosis falling skies rodney king Webb Simpson

Holiday Open House in Cypress Creek Lakes - Cy-Fair Real Estate

Holiday Open House in Cypress Creek Lakes | Cypress, TX Homes and Real Estate

Holiday Open House in Cypress Creek Lakes

Courtesy of Cypress Creek Lakes

This weekend, Santa Claus made a special stop in Cypress Creek Lakes. The Cypress Creek Lakes Holiday Open House was held Sunday, December 2nd from Noon to 5 pm at the community?s new Phase 3 Recreation Center. Over 500 people attended this fun event.

Prospective home buyers, residents and area Real Estate Agents stopped by for some holiday fun including:

Free photos with Santa Claus
Free gourmet coffee, hot chocolate & bakery items
Listened to the Warner Elementary School Choir
Registered to win an Apple iPad
Met H-E-B Buddy courtesy of the new H-E-B Fairfield Market

Dawn Mulholland was the lucky winner of the Apple iPad drawing.

?

Cypress Creek Lakes Homes For Sale

Showing properties 1 - 25 of 26. See more Homes in Cypress Creek Lakes tract.
(all data current as of 12/5/2012)

  1. 4 beds, 4 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,128 sq ft

    Lot size: 8,750 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 1

    Listed with Darling Homes

  2. 3 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 3,525 sq ft

    Lot size: 9,690 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 1

    Listed with Darling Homes

  3. 4 beds, 4 full baths

    Home size: 3,523 sq ft

    Lot size: 8,750 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 2

    Listed with Darling Homes

  4. 5 beds, 4 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,299 sq ft

    Year built: 2013

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 7

    Listed with Lennar Homes/Village Builders

  5. 4 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,409 sq ft

    Year built: 2013

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 7

    Listed with Lennar Homes/Village Builders

  6. 5 beds, 4 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,656 sq ft

    Lot size: 13,369 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 21

    Listed with Realty Associates

  7. 4 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 2,973 sq ft

    Lot size: 9,837 sqft

    Year built: 2007

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 25

    Listed with Sapphire Realty

  8. 3 beds, 2 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 2,054 sq ft

    Year built: 2013

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 25

    Listed with Lennar Homes/Village Builders

  9. 3 beds, 2 full baths

    Home size: 2,600 sq ft

    Lot size: 11,306 sqft

    Year built: 2006

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 25

    Listed with Realty Associates

  10. 3 beds, 3 full baths

    Home size: 2,167 sq ft

    Year built: 2013

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 27

    Listed with Lennar Homes/Village Builders

  11. 4 beds, 4 full baths

    Home size: 2,625 sq ft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 34

    Listed with Keller Williams Signature

  12. 3 beds, 2 full baths

    Home size: 2,092 sq ft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 34

    Listed with Keller Williams Signature

  13. 4 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 3,158 sq ft

    Lot size: 8,497 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 41

    Listed with Perry Development Management

  14. 5 beds, 4 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,888 sq ft

    Lot size: 14,313 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 42

    Listed with Perry Development Management

  15. 5 beds, 4 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,930 sq ft

    Lot size: 13,306 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 4

    Days on market: 42

    Listed with Perry Development Management

  16. 4 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 3,184 sq ft

    Lot size: 7,483 sqft

    Year built: 2007

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 58

    Listed with Sapphire Realty

  17. 5 beds, 5 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,216 sq ft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 70

    Listed with Darling Homes

  18. 4 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 4,007 sq ft

    Lot size: 8,750 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 70

    Listed with Darling Homes

  19. 4 beds, 3 full, 2 part baths

    Home size: 3,645 sq ft

    Lot size: 8,750 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 70

    Listed with Darling Homes

  20. 5 beds, 4 full baths

    Home size: 3,399 sq ft

    Lot size: 7,500 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 96

    Listed with Perry Development Management

  21. 4 beds, 3 full baths

    Home size: 2,888 sq ft

    Lot size: 7,500 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 98

    Listed with Perry Development Management

  22. 4 beds, 3 full baths

    Home size: 2,942 sq ft

    Lot size: 7,500 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 99

    Listed with Perry Development Management

  23. 5 beds, 5 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 3,867 sq ft

    Lot size: 13,200 sqft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 105

    Listed with Gatehouse Properties

  24. 4 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 2,589 sq ft

    Year built: 2012

    Parking spots: 2

    Days on market: 118

    Listed with Keller Williams Signature

  25. 5 beds, 3 full, 1 part baths

    Home size: 5,830 sq ft

    Lot size: 13,950 sqft

    Year built: 2006

    Parking spots: 3

    Days on market: 126

    Listed with RE/MAX Realty Center

Listing information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Read full disclaimer.

?

About Jim Mulholland

Jim Mulholland is the owner / broker at Mulholland Realty. ?Jim has been a REALTOR in the Cypress, TX area since 2005 focusing mainly on the larger master planned communities in the area such as Blackhorse Ranch, Bridgeland, Coles Crossing, Fairfield, Longwood Village, Northlake Forest, Rock Creek, Stone Gate, and Towne Lake. View all posts by Jim Mulholland

?

Copyright ? 2012, Houston Realtors Information Service, Inc.

The information provided is exclusively for consumers? personal, non-commercial use, and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing. This data is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed accurate by the MLS.

This IDX solution is (c) Diverse Solutions 2012.

Source: http://cyfairrealestate.com/blog/holiday-open-house-in-cypress-creek-lakes/

fashion star andrew bird lizzie borden lizzie borden iona taylor allderdice mixtape andrew bogut

There can be no principled objection to the regulation by the state of ...

Dan Hind?dismisses as nonsense the argument being voiced by the press regarding the menace of statutory regulation, noting that journalists are subject to arbitrary interference by editors and owners. While individuals have the inherent right to free speech,?writing or speaking as an employee of a company precludes that ability.

Journalists and their editors have an unusual privilege. As brokers of public speech they largely determine how the world beyond our immediate experience appears to us. They decide what matters and who to take seriously. This privilege is particularly pronounced when it comes to their own trade, where, after all, they have firsthand knowledge. And they do not like to let outsiders in on the process, if they can help it. The anthropologist Georgina Born describes in her book?Uncertain Vision?a 1997 conversation with Jim Gray and Jeremy Paxman of?Newsnight:

Both of them talk genially, reflectively, about how ironic it is that Newsnight and News and Current Affairs continually make claims for access to private and public institutions in the name of the public interest, and yet here they are, querying whether they should grant me access to their 11 am meeting. They don?t.

At the moment the press are taking full advantage of their privileged position to talk a lot of nonsense about the menace that statutory regulation would pose to a free press. The unnamed authors of a?Telegraph?editorial?tell their readers that ?the growing clamour for press regulation backed by statute threatens a priceless British freedom?. The unnamed authors of an?Independent?editorial meanwhile opine that ?for the most part, the British press, national and local, is the most vibrant, innovative, and tenacious in the world, and we know how to hold those in authority properly to account. We should be wary of anything that impairs that?.

These self-styled defenders of a free press fail to mention that they are usually employees of, or freelance contractors with, publicly traded companies that enjoy limited liability. Insofar as they are dependent for their position on the management of these companies they are not themselves free in any serious way. One does not often hear a journalist holding his employer ?properly to account?. As James Harrington once remarked, ?he who wants bread is his servant that will feed him?. And the condition of dependence remains after immediate needs are met. The lure of the preferment is perhaps even more corrupting than the fear of destitution.

Not surprisingly, these servants are not terribly reliable guides to free expression, or the ways in which the existing systems of communication frustrate it. So let?s talk for a moment as though we aren?t afraid that we?ll never be commissioned to write for a newspaper again.

Only human beings are capable of speech. It follows that freedom of speech is a right than can only be claimed by human beings. Corporate controlled speech is already unfree, since it is already subject to arbitrary interference by editors and owners. The artificial monsters that control the bulk of print, broadcast and online media are not human beings and to consider them as such is only to succumb to their game of lucrative make-believe. Therefore we can regulate them in ways that cause no harm to the principle of free speech. We can coerce them in ways that would be unacceptable if applied to individuals.

If an individual wishes to speak freely he or she can only do so as an individual. There should be no law abridging the freedom of the press in this regard. If I want to publish my own views, without the sheltering privilege of limited liability, then I should be entirely free to do so. The law should not interfere with my right to free expression, insofar as it does not infringe on the rights of others. I will stand full square behind what I write and take the consequences. But if I write or speak as an employee of a company, I am not writing as a free citizen. The organizations at whose pleasure I serve are creatures of state power. They fall, quite rightly, under the jealous eye of the sovereign power. They exist only insofar as they serve the common good.

There are important discussions to be had about the form that regulation takes. It is also reasonable to be concerned at the scope of regulation, the definition of a news publisher in the era of digital technology, and so on. But there can be no objection in principle to the regulation by the state of entities that enjoy a privilege granted by the state.

That said, while it might be desirable to regulate the press, to give a right to reply to wronged individuals, to set limits on the concentration of ownership and so on, this falls very far short of the changes needed if our communications system is to serve the cause of freedom. For one thing, the libel laws remain an unacceptable hindrance to open exchange and meaningful public debate.

More seriously, as Pierre Bourdieu once said, journalism is ?a very powerful profession made up of very vulnerable individuals?. We rely on these vulnerable individuals to tell us about the world beyond our immediate experience. We rely on them for our picture of the world, for our sense of what is important and what can be ignored. But they aren?t vulnerable to us. They are vulnerable to their employers. Their employers are vulnerable in turn, but not to us.

Newspapers and broadcasters are courts, to use a good old republican term of abuse. They are closed to outside scrutiny. They reward those who serve them faithfully and they punish those who do not. The institutions operate in a world of power that is, at best, opaque. Not surprisingly, journalists struggle to describe reality when doing so challenges the interests of those who are in a position to harm them. That?s not to say that the people working in the media are all villains, far from it. But villainy is often the best policy. And even those who try their best to serve the public interest do so in conditions of vulnerability that they cannot adequately acknowledge.

The News International scandal created an opportunity to introduce some kind of regulation of the press. But mechanisms to curb the worst abuses will not create the journalism we need. It is time we started thinking seriously about the kind of communications system a free people needs.

This was originally posted on Dan?s personal blog The Return of the Public.

Note: This article gives the views of the?author, and not the position of the British Politics and Policy blog, nor of the London School of Economics.?Please read our?comments policy?before posting.

About the author

Dan Hind?is the author of two books,?The Threat to Reason?and?The Return of the Public, which won the Bristol Festival of Ideas Prize in 2011. His e-book, Maximum Republic is published this week.

You may also be interested in the following posts (automatically generated):

  1. The government should resist calls for further press regulation in the wake of the phone hacking scandal. Further regulation would seriously hamper independent journalism.
  2. Revenge of the Evil Empire and why I?m backing Darth Vader: my case against statutory newspaper regulation
  3. Book Review: Media Regulation: Governance and the Interests of Citizens and Consumers by Peter Lunt and Sonia Livingstone
  4. Self-regulation is not working to keep British media factual about climate change

Source: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2012/12/03/leveson-and-leviathan-or-what-the-papers-wont-say/

emmys torrey smith torrey smith oakland raiders Jessica Lange NFL scores week 3 kat dennings